Sino-tibetski jezici

Sino-tibetski jezici (crveno), među svetskim jezičkim porodicama

Glavni sino-tibetski jezici

  Kineski

  Tibetski

  Lolo-burmanski (Burmanski)

  Karenski

  Ostali

Sino-tibetski jezici su sa 1.300.000.000 govornika druga najveća jezička porodica na svetu. Ovoj grupi pripada 340 jezika koji se govore u Kini, regionu Himalaja i Jugoistočnoj Aziji. Dele se u dve grupe jezika: kineske (osam jezika sa 1.220.000.000 govornika) i tibeto-burmanske jezike (330 jezika sa 70 miliona govornika).

Ranije su jezici tai-kadai, hmong-mijen i vijetnamski uvrštavani u ovu grupu. Iako imaju fonoloških i sintaksičkih sličnosti sa sino-tibetskim jezicima, od 1950-ih većina lingvista prve dve grupe posmatra kao posebne porodice, dok vijetnamski smatra jednim od austroazijskih jezika.

Kineska grana jezika se koristi širom Kine i na Tajvanu, tibeto-burmanski jezici se govore u oblasti Himalaja i obližnjim oblastima Jugoistočne Azije, pre svega na Tibetu, južnoj Kini, Burmi, Nepalu, Butanu, severnoj Indiji i delovima Pakistana, Bangladeša, Laosa, Vijetnama i Tajlanda.

Najveći jezik iz ove porodice je mandarinski kineski koji govori 875 miliona ljudi. Slede vu kineski (80 miliona), kantonski kineski (70 miliona), min kineski (60 miliona), đin kineski (45 miliona), sjang kineski (36 miliona), hakka kineski (33 miliona) i gan kineski (21 miliona). Najveći tibetsko-burmanski jezici su burmanski (35 miliona kao prvi jezik i 15 miliona drugih govornika), južnokineski jezik ji (4,2 miliona), tibetski (2 miliona kao prvi jezik, sa dijalektima 4,5 miliona), zgav (2 miliona u Burmi) i majtaj (skoro 2 miliiona u severnoj Indiji).

Klasifikacija

• Sino-tibetski
  • Kineski jezici (8 jezika, 1.220.000.000 govornika)
  • Tibeto-burmanski (330 jezika, 68 miliona govornika)
    • Bodijski jezici sa tibetskim, tamang-gale, šangla, takpa, dimal-toto jezicima
    • Zapadnohimalajski
    • Jezici mahakiranti kiranti, magar-čepang, nevari-tangmi
    • Severnoasamski tani, kova-sulung, mijuiš, idu-digaru
    • Hrusijski jezici
    • Bodo-konjak-jingpo jezici bodo-koh, konjak, jingpo-sak
    • Kuki-čin-naga jezici mizo-kuki-čin, ao, angami-počuri, zeme, tankul, manipuri
    • Đang-gjalrong jezici đang, gjalrong
    • Nungijski jezici
    • Karenijski jezici
    • Lolo-burmanski jezici lolo i burmanski
    • izolovani jezici: pju †, dura †, lepša, mru, naksi, tudžia, baj

Opšte karakteristike

Fonologija

Kineski jezici su jednosložni (skoro sve morfeme se sastoje iz jednog sloga) i tonalni, poput jezika tai-kadai i vijetnamskog. Mnogi tibeto-burmanski jezici imaju reči od više slogova. Tonski akcenat ne postoji u zapadnotibetskim i burmanskim jezicima.

Morfosintaksa

Uobičajen red reči u kineskom jeziku je subjekat-glagol-objekat. Neki tibeto-burmanski jezici takođe praktikuju ovaj red reči, dok većina prati šablon subjekat-objekat-glagol.

Zajedničko za sve sino-tibetske jezike je sistem suglasničkih prefiksa i sufiksa. Oni u svim jezicima imaju sličnu funkciju.

Kineski jezici su analitički jezici i praktično nemaju morfologiju.

Za tibeto-burmanske jezike je karakteristična velika morfološka raznolikost. U velikom broju jezika postoji gramatičko slaganje subjekta i predikata. Kod nekih jezika postoji sistem padeža, tipično nekoliko vrsta ergativa, a negde i sistem nominativ-akuzativ. Zamenice i glagoli mogu da razlikuju jedninu, možinu, dual i kategoriju inkluzivno/ekskluzivno za prvo lice množine. Za ove jezike karakteristična je i aglutinativna struktura koja se tipično ostvaruje sufiksima.

Literatura

• Baxter, William H. (1992), A Handbook of Old Chinese Phonology, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, ISBN 978-3-11-012324-1. 
• Beckwith, Christopher I. (1996), „The Morphological Argument for the Existence of Sino-Tibetan”, Pan-Asiatic Linguistics: Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Languages and Linguistics, January 8–10, 1996, Bangkok: Mahidol University at Salaya, str. 812—826. 
• ——— (2002a), „Introduction”, Ur.: Beckwith, Christopher, Medieval Tibeto-Burman languages, Brill, str. xiii—xix, ISBN 978-90-04-12424-0. 
• ——— (2002b), „The Sino-Tibetan problem”, Ur.: Beckwith, Christopher, Medieval Tibeto-Burman languages, Brill, str. 113—158, ISBN 978-90-04-12424-0. 
• Benedict, Paul K. (1942), „Thai, Kadai, and Indonesian: A New Alignment in Southeastern Asia”, American Anthropologist, 44 (4): 576—601, JSTOR 663309, doi:10.1525/aa.1942.44.4.02a00040. 
• ——— (1972), Sino-Tibetan: A Conspectus (PDF), Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0-521-08175-7. 
• Blench, Roger; Post, Mark (2014), „Rethinking Sino-Tibetan phylogeny from the perspective of North East Indian languages”, Ur.: Hill, Nathan W.; Owen-Smith, Thomas, Trans-Himalayan Linguistics, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, str. 71—104, ISBN 978-3-11-031083-2.  (preprint)
• Bodman, Nicholas C. (1980), „Proto-Chinese and Sino-Tibetan: data towards establishing the nature of the relationship”, Ur.: van Coetsem, Frans; Waugh, Linda R., Contributions to historical linguistics: issues and materials, Leiden: E. J. Brill, str. 34—199, ISBN 978-90-04-06130-9. 
• Burling, Robbins (1983), „The Sal Languages” (PDF), Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area, 7 (2): 1—32. 
• DeLancey, Scott (2009), „Sino-Tibetan languages”, Ur.: Comrie, Bernard, The World's Major Languages (2nd izd.), Routledge, str. 693—702, ISBN 978-1-134-26156-7. 
• van Driem, George (1987), A grammar of Limbu, Mouton grammar library, 4, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, ISBN 978-3-11-011282-5. 
• ——— (1997), „Sino-Bodic”, Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, 60 (3): 455—488, doi:10.1017/S0041977X0003250X. 
• ——— (2001), Languages of the Himalayas: An Ethnolinguistic Handbook of the Greater Himalayan Region, Brill, ISBN 978-90-04-12062-4. 
• ——— (2005), „Tibeto-Burman vs Indo-Chinese” (PDF), Ur.: Sagart, Laurent; Blench, Roger; Sanchez-Mazas, Alicia, The Peopling of East Asia: Putting Together Archaeology, Linguistics and Genetics, London: Routledge Curzon, str. 81—106, ISBN 978-0-415-32242-3, Arhivirano iz originala (PDF) 29. 05. 2022. g., Pristupljeno 11. 05. 2019. 
• ——— (2007), „The diversity of the Tibeto-Burman language family and the linguistic ancestry of Chinese” (PDF), Bulletin of Chinese Linguistics, 1 (2): 211—270, Arhivirano iz originala (PDF) 09. 07. 2022. g., Pristupljeno 11. 05. 2019. 
• ——— (2014), „Trans-Himalayan” (PDF), Ur.: Owen-Smith, Thomas; Hill, Nathan W., Trans-Himalayan Linguistics: Historical and Descriptive Linguistics of the Himalayan Area, Berlin: de Gruyter, str. 11—40, ISBN 978-3-11-031083-2, Arhivirano iz originala (PDF) 06. 12. 2020. g., Pristupljeno 11. 05. 2019. 
• Dryer, Matthew S. (2003), „Word order in Sino-Tibetan languages from a typological and geographical perspective”, Ur.: Thurgood, Graham; LaPolla, Randy J., The Sino-Tibetan languages, London: Routledge, str. 43—55, ISBN 978-0-7007-1129-1. 
• Finck, Franz Nikolaus (1909), Die Sprachstämme des Erdkreises, Leipzig: B.G. Teubner. 
• Gong, Hwang-cherng (1980), „A Comparative Study of the Chinese, Tibetan, and Burmese Vowel Systems”, Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, 51: 455—489. 
• Hale, Austin (1982), Research on Tibeto-Burman Languages, State-of-the-art report, Trends in linguistics, 14, Walter de Gruyter, ISBN 978-90-279-3379-9. 
• Handel, Zev (2008), „What is Sino-Tibetan? Snapshot of a Field and a Language Family in Flux”, Language and Linguistics Compass, 2 (3): 422—441, doi:10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00061.x. 
• Hill, Nathan W. (2012), „The six vowel hypothesis of Old Chinese in comparative context”, Bulletin of Chinese Linguistics, 6 (2): 1—69, doi:10.1163/2405478x-90000100. 
• ——— (2014), „Cognates of Old Chinese *-n, *-r, and *-j in Tibetan and Burmese”, Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale, 43 (2): 91—109, doi:10.1163/19606028-00432p02 
• Klaproth, Julius (1823), Asia Polyglotta, Paris: B.A. Shubart. 
• Kuhn, Ernst (1889), „Beiträge zur Sprachenkunde Hinterindiens” (PDF), Sitzungsberichte der Königlichen Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Philosophisch-Philologische und Historische Klasse, Sitzung vom 2 März 1889, München, str. 189—236. 
• LaPolla, Randy J. (2003), „Overview of Sino-Tibetan morphosyntax”, Ur.: Thurgood, Graham; LaPolla, Randy J., The Sino-Tibetan languages, London: Routledge, str. 22—42, ISBN 978-0-7007-1129-1. 
• Lewis, M. Paul; Simons, Gary F.; Fennig, Charles D., ur. (2015), Ethnologue: Languages of the World (Eighteenth izd.), Dallas, Texas: SIL International. 
• Li, Fang-Kuei (1937), „Languages and Dialects”, Ur.: Shih, Ch'ao-ying; Chang, Ch'i-hsien, The Chinese Year Book, Commercial Press, str. 59—65,  reprinted as Li, Fang-Kuei (1973), „Languages and Dialects of China”, Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 1 (1): 1—13, JSTOR 23749774. 
• Logan, James R. (1856), „The Maruwi of the Baniak Islands”, Journal of the Indian Archipelago and Eastern Asia, 1 (1): 1—42. 
• ——— (1858), „The West-Himalaic or Tibetan tribes of Asam, Burma and Pegu”, Journal of the Indian Archipelago and Eastern Asia, 2 (1): 68—114. 
• Matisoff, James A. (1991), „Sino-Tibetan Linguistics: Present State and Future Prospects”, Annual Review of Anthropology, 20: 469—504, JSTOR 2155809, doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.20.1.469. 
• ——— (2000), „On 'Sino-Bodic' and Other Symptoms of Neosubgroupitis”, Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, 63 (3): 356—369, JSTOR 1559492, doi:10.1017/s0041977x00008442. 
• ——— (2003), Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman: System and Philosophy of Sino-Tibetan Reconstruction, Berkeley: University of California Press, ISBN 978-0-520-09843-5. 
• Miller, Roy Andrew (1974), „Sino-Tibetan: Inspection of a Conspectus”, Journal of the American Oriental Society, 94 (2): 195—209, JSTOR 600891, doi:10.2307/600891. 
• Norman, Jerry (1988), Chinese, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0-521-29653-3. 
• Przyluski, Jean (1924), „Langues sino-tibétaines”, Ur.: Meillet, Antoine; Cohen, Marcel, Les langues du monde, Librairie ancienne Édouard Champion, str. 361—384. 
• Przyluski, J.; Luce, G. H. (1931), „The Number 'A Hundred' in Sino-Tibetan”, Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, 6 (3): 667—668, doi:10.1017/S0041977X00093150. 
• Sagart, Laurent (2005), „Sino-Tibetan–Austronesian: an updated and improved argument”, Ur.: Sagart, Laurent; Blench, Roger; Sanchez-Mazas, Alicia, The Peopling of East Asia: Putting Together Archaeology, Linguistics and Genetics, London: Routledge Curzon, str. 161—176, ISBN 978-0-415-32242-3. 
• Sapir, Edward (1925), „Review: Les Langues du Monde”, Modern Language Notes, 40 (6): 373—375, JSTOR 2914102, doi:10.2307/2914102. 
• Shafer, Robert (1952), „Athapaskan and Sino-Tibetan”, International Journal of American Linguistics, 18 (1): 12—19, JSTOR 1263121, doi:10.1086/464142. 
• ——— (1955), „Classification of the Sino-Tibetan languages”, Word (Journal of the Linguistic Circle of New York), 11 (1): 94—111, doi:10.1080/00437956.1955.11659552. 
• ——— (1966), Introduction to Sino-Tibetan, 1, Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz, ISBN 978-3-447-01559-2. 
• Sharma, Devidatta (1988), A Descriptive Grammar of Kinnauri, Mittal Publications, ISBN 978-81-7099-049-9. 
• Starosta, Stanley (2005), „Proto-East Asian and the origin and dispersal of languages of east and southeast Asia and the Pacific”, Ur.: Sagart, Laurent; Blench, Roger; Sanchez-Mazas, Alicia, The Peopling of East Asia: Putting Together Archaeology, Linguistics and Genetics, London: Routledge Curzon, str. 182—197, ISBN 978-0-415-32242-3. 
• Taylor, Keith (1992), „The Early Kingdoms”, Ur.: Tarling, Nicholas, The Cambridge History of Southeast Asia Volume 1: From Early Times to c. 1800, Cambridge University Press, str. 137—182, ISBN 978-0-521-35505-6, doi:10.1017/CHOL9780521355056.005. 
• Thurgood, Graham (2003), „A subgrouping of the Sino-Tibetan languages”, Ur.: Thurgood, Graham; LaPolla, Randy J., The Sino-Tibetan languages, London: Routledge, str. 3—21, ISBN 978-0-7007-1129-1. 
• Tournadre, Nicolas (2014), „The Tibetic languages and their classification”, Ur.: Owen-Smith, Thomas; Hill, Nathan W., Trans-Himalayan Linguistics: Historical and Descriptive Linguistics of the Himalayan Area, De Gruyter, str. 103—129, ISBN 978-3-11-031074-0. 
• Wheatley, Julian K. (2003), „Burmese”, Ur.: Thurgood, Graham; LaPolla, Randy J., The Sino-Tibetan languages, London: Routledge, str. 195—207, ISBN 978-0-7007-1129-1. 
• Yanson, Rudolf A. (2006), „Notes on the evolution of the Burmese phonological system”, Ur.: Beckwith, Christopher I., Medieval Tibeto-Burman Languages II, Leiden: Brill, str. 103—120, ISBN 978-90-04-15014-0. 
• Wu, Anqi (1987), Han Zang yu shi dong he wan cheng ti qian zhui de can cui he tong yuan de dong ci ci gen, Arhivirano iz originala 05. 05. 2019. g., Pristupljeno 11. 05. 2019 
• Wang, Li (1980), Han Yu shi gao (zhong), Zhong hua shu ju, str. 221 
• Wu, Anqi (2002), Han Zang yu tong yuan yan jiu, Beijing: Zhong yang min zu da xue chu ban she, str. 9—12, ISBN 978-7810566117 
• You, Rujie (1982), Lun Tai yu liang ci zai Han yu nan fang fang yan zhong de di ceng yi cui 
• Sun, Hongkai (1996), Lun Zang Mian yu de yu fa xing shi, Arhivirano iz originala 05. 05. 2019. g., Pristupljeno 11. 05. 2019 
• Dai, Qingxia (1997), Jing Po yu ci de shuang yin jie hua dui yu fa de ying xiang 
• Shi, Lin (1991), Tong yu sheng diao de gong shi biao xian he li shi yan bian 
• Xu, Xijian (1987), On the origin and development of noun classifiers in JingPo (PDF), Prevod: LaPolla, Randy J., Minzu Yuwen, str. 27—35 
• Dai, Qingzia (1994), Zangmian yu geti liangci yanjiu [A study on numeral classifiers in Tibeto-Burman], Beijing: Zhongyang MInzu Xueyuan Chubanshe, str. 166—181 
• Bradley, David (2012), The characteristics of the Burmic family of Tibeto-Burman (PDF), str. 171—192, Arhivirano iz originala (PDF) 22. 06. 2019. g., Pristupljeno 11. 05. 2019 
• Baron, Stephen P. (1973), The classifier-alone-plus-noun construction: a study in areal diffusion, University of California, San Diego 
• LaPolla, Randy J.; Huang, Chenglong (2003), A Grammar of Qiang, with Annotated Texts and Glossary, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, ISBN 9783110197273 
• Thurgood, Graham; LaPolla, Randy J. (2017), The Sino-Tibetan languages, New York: Routledge, str. 46, ISBN 978-1-138-78332-4 
• Bauman, James (1974), „Pronominal Verb Morphology in Tibeto-Burman” (PDF), Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area, 1 (1): 108—155. 
• Baxter, William H. (1995), Wang, William S.-Y., ur., „The Ancestry of the Chinese Language”, Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph Series, Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monographs, Berkeley: Project on Linguistic Analysis, 8 (8): 1—39, JSTOR 23826142. 
• Benedict, Paul K. (1976), „Sino-Tibetan: Another Look”, Journal of the American Oriental Society, 96 (2): 167—197, JSTOR 599822, doi:10.2307/599822. 
• Blench, Roger; Post, Mark (2011), (De)classifying Arunachal languages: Reconstructing the evidence (PDF). 
• Coblin, W. South (1986), A Sinologist's Handlist of Sino-Tibetan Lexical Comparisons, Monumenta Serica monograph series, 18, Nettetal: Steyler Verlag, ISBN 978-3-87787-208-6. 
• van Driem, George (1995), „Black Mountain Conjugational Morphology, Proto-Tibeto-Burman Morphosyntax, and the Linguistic Position of Chinese” (PDF), Senri Ethnological Studies, 41: 229—259, Arhivirano iz originala (PDF) 27. 09. 2020. g., Pristupljeno 11. 05. 2019. 
• ——— (2003), „Tibeto-Burman vs. Sino-Tibetan”, Ur.: Winter, Werner; Bauer, Brigitte L. M.; Pinault, Georges-Jean, Language in time and space: a Festschrift for Werner Winter on the occasion of his 80th birthday, Walter de Gruyter, str. 101—119, ISBN 978-3-11-017648-3. 
• Gong, Hwang-cherng (2002), Hàn Zàng yǔ yánjiū lùnwén jí 漢藏語硏究論文集 [Collected papers on Sino-Tibetan linguistics], Taipei: Academia Sinica, ISBN 978-957-671-872-4. 
• Jacques, Guillaume (2006), „La morphologie du sino-tibétain”, La Linguistique Comparative en France Aujourd'hui. 
• Kuhn, Ernst (1883), Über Herkunft und Sprache der transgangetischen Völker (PDF), Munich: Verlag d. k. b. Akademie. 
• Starostin, Sergei; Peiros, Ilia (1996), A Comparative Vocabulary of Five Sino-Tibetan Languages, Melbourne University Press, OCLC 53387435. 

Spoljašnje veze

• Klasifikacija sino-tibetskih jezika (jezik: nemački)
• Etimologija sino-tibetskih jezika (jezik: engleski)
• Žak Gijom: O sino-tibetskoj morfologiji (jezik: francuski)
• James Matisoff, "Tibeto-Burman languages and their subgrouping"
• Sino-Tibetan Branches Project (STBP)
• Guillaume Jacques, "The Genetic Position of Chinese"
• Marc Miyake (2014), "Why Sino-Tibetan reconstruction is not like Indo-European reconstruction (yet)"
• Andrew Hsiu (2018), "Linking the Sino-Tibetan fallen leaves"